Skip to content

Lumiere (2000) by Rochas

Women 1984

Brand
Rochas

Description

Lumiere (2000) by Rochas is a floral fragrance for women. Launched in 1984, this composition was created by perfumer Michel Almairac. Its olfactory structure unfolds with an opening of aldehydes, neroli, violet, and bergamot; a heart evoking rose, honeysuckle, neroli, hyacinth, ylang-ylang, jasmine, valley lily, and iris; and a sweet, woody base formed by vanilla, tonka bean, cedar, and vetiver.

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 9.9%
  • Spring 36%
  • Summer 32%
  • Autumn 21%
  • Day 76%
  • Night 24%

Key notes

Community

299 votes

  • Positive 73%
  • Negative 25%
  • Neutral 1.7%
positive reviews 299 community votes
LongevityLong-lasting SillageModerate Best momentDay CharacterFeminine

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I owned it

780 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Spring

182 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Day

117 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About Lumiere (2000)

Main accord white-floral Year 1984 Gender Women Perfumer Michel Almairac

Lumiere (2000) by Rochas is a floral fragrance for women. Launched in 1984, this composition was created by perfumer Michel Almairac. Its olfactory structure unfolds with an opening of aldehydes, neroli, violet, and bergamot; a heart evoking rose, honeysuckle, neroli, hyacinth, ylang-ylang, jasmine, valley lily, and iris; and a sweet, woody base formed by vanilla, tonka bean, cedar, and vetiver.

Flowers White flowers Spices Woods and mosses

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Long-lasting

78 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Moderate

111 votes

Character

Leading answer Traditionally feminine

25 votes

Value perception

Leading answer Fair price

18 votes

Community reviews

4 reviews

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review
  1. One of the ugliest rose accords ever created. Rochas’ Lumiere from 2000 is a crime; I’ve rarely seen a rose smell so mousey and sickly. It smelled like sweet, dirty rose with hints of morning breath, musky and awful—like sniffing a used paper handkerchief. I remember the simple crystal bottle, the orange-and-silver box, and the ad of a model frolicking on the beach at sunset. I tried it and was deeply disappointed. None of that promised sensual modernity was here. The opening was washed-out, a very soft citrus note, but once it developed, horrible aldehydes and wild flowers came out, churning my stomach with a mix of insecticide and wax. The worst was the rose, which turned everything into a musky flower radiating dirt, old dust, fake teeth, and stiff blankets. A horror. God himself wouldn’t buy this, because that modern promise vanished the moment you sprayed it. What it carried was something old and outdated, like a musty catalog perfume in an older woman’s vanity. I’ve seen it in Madame Rochas’ bottle before; I don’t know if it’s the new version or the original from the eighties, and I never bothered to check. If you want to try a rose accord that tastes like crickets and rancid sweat, go for it.

  2. One of the ugliest rose accords ever created. The 2000 version is a crime; I’ve rarely seen a rose so rat-like and sickly. I’m not sure if La Dame de Noir’s phrase ‘rose with hints of a cricket cage’ applies here, but that’s exactly what it smelled like: a rose with a sweet, dirty aftertaste and an insecticide sting, punctuated by horrid musky morning breath, like smelling a used tissue. I remember the simple crystal bottle, the orange and silver box, and the magazine ad featuring a voluptuous woman on the beach at dusk, during the golden hour. I tried it and was deeply disappointed. There was none of that sensual modernity from 2000; the opening was washed-out, a soft, light citrus, but as it developed, it turned into horrible, gritty aldehydes mixed with undefined wild flowers that made my stomach churn, smelling like a blend of insecticide and hair wax. The worst part was the rose acting like it owned the place, turning everything into a musky rose radiating dirt, dust, old dentures, and cardboard blankets. Pure horror. Not even God would buy this, because that modern promise vanished the moment you sprayed it, leaving something old and antique, like a stale catalog perfume in an older woman’s vanity. I’ve seen it in the Madame Rochas bottle once, don’t know if it’s the new version or the original from the eighties, and I never bothered to check. If anyone wants to savor a rose accord with the taste of crickets, rancid sweat, and dirty mouths, go ahead and try it. Gives me the chills.

  3. First of all, let me say: I’M BACK!!! Come back, Lumiere, please. It’s so incredible, so ethereal, so unique. It has nothing to do with the rest. Fresh, present, yet not intrusive, a scent that never fails to please. Powdery, delicate, super feminine. The trail and longevity are medium; you need to reapply every 5 hours. But I’ve been showered with so many compliments. I’m sorry they cut it here. Greetings from wonderful Mendoza, Argentina♥

  4. I’m back, Lumiere, please! It’s incredible—so ethereal and unique. Nothing compares to what I’ve tried before. Fresh with presence but never intrusive; a scent that doesn’t tire you out. Powdery, delicate, and super feminine. The trail and longevity are moderate; I need to reapply every 5 hours, but it made me feel so complimented. I’m sorry it’s discontinued here. Greetings from the wonderful Mendoza, Argentina♥