Men
Andrés Croxatto Man
Acordes principales
Descripción
Andrés Croxatto Man by Andres Croxatto is a fruity chypre fragrance for men. Launched in 2021, it was created by Chris Maurice and Andrés Croxatto.
Resumen rápido
Cuándo llevarla (votos)
Notas clave
Comunidad
1,733 votos
- Positivo 62%
- Negativo 32%
- Neutral 6.0%
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Andrés Croxatto Man y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
40 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
Haha, they get offended by bots, and when someone speaks well of this fragrance, they fill it with ‘thumbs down’. I wear it halfway; although it’s not a groundbreaking scent, it’s good for a backup. It has good longevity and projection, but the problem is its cost, relatively high for the type of scent it offers. It’s not bad, but it’s expensive.
Croxatto has poured all his ego into this fragrance, which is here to stay. It’s the new, improved version that Egoiste never had. He’s gone past Chanel and outpaced them on the right. What audacity in a perfume. If you want an improved Egoiste, this is your option without a doubt. It’s here to stay, come what may.
Honestly, it’s garbage for the price I paid. There were 1,000 better options with what I had to spend.
I bought this with high expectations. It’s not a scent that turns my head, but it does generate compliments. It’s very masculine, classy enough for casual to semi-formal wear. At first, you notice the citrus and gin, then the moss and neroli. It has development, though to me it feels a bit linear. To be honest: with 5 sprays, you notice nothing. You need 12 or 16 to project what, for the price, shouldn’t be worth it as a signature; however, if you have many fragrances, it’s worth having in the collection. In conclusion, if you have the means, buy it. It’s a good scent that gets compliments, nothing special, but I won’t buy it again.
What I notice is that the pattern of the review bars is completely unnatural; for example, one side of the bar is full and the other empty. That indicates bias or bots. I only smelled it on a tester strip and it’s not that bad, but I didn’t like it. No way would I pay what it costs. I think Andrés took advantage of his YouTube platform and overrated the perfume.
Great fragrance, fresh and timeless with incredible longevity. In short, I love it and I don’t understand the negative reviews.
We need to be clear with those who confuse themselves with reviews: this perfume smells like a joke. The price-to-quality ratio is pure mockery.
I’ll be brief: the scent is good, but the projection is terrible and the price is absurd. The worst part is that in many countries, it’s still a blind buy. I love surprises when the price is low, but this is more expensive than an AdG Parfum, and unlike that one, the AdG can actually be tested.
What garbage is this fragrance! It’s a scam for that price; with the same money, you can buy a Hugo Boss, Polo, or Versace that are infinitely superior. I demand a refund; it’s a brutal trap. Plus, as Andrés says in his video, it eventually smells like mushrooms. 1/10.
In short, it’s a failed attempt to copy an Aventus that doesn’t even reach the level of Cedrat Boisee. If you like fruity cypresses, you might enjoy it, but the evolution is simple and lacks style. My batch was one of the first, and while the scent has no flaws, I got it as a gift; had I paid for it, I would have been disappointed. For the same price, I bought an Ormonde Jayne fragrance that smells like the gardens of Olympus. True, there are better options at that price, many. Cheers.
Clearly, this isn’t the best review on the forum. There’s a difference between criticizing a perfume and attacking the creator. I agree it’s expensive and doesn’t last long, and that Andrés sells it as the definitive fragrance, scamming a lot of people. I’m a follower of his, but this is going too far.
To a large extent, I overlooked the ‘This fragrance reminds me of…’ part, but comparing Chanel and Creed to Andrés Croxatto Man is scandalous. I wrote that they don’t think we’re stupid, but they have us commenting on this for months, which generates curiosity to try it. I haven’t spent a cent, but some people have. Anyway, I recommend to completely ignore this topic.
To sum up, it doesn’t smell bad, it has interesting things, but its evolution and trail are disappointing, especially for an expensive fragrance. The opening is very fresh, with clear lemon and bergamot, and the gin gives it personality. You can notice the green touch, like ‘freshly cut grass,’ but it’s not the main focus. As it dries down, it becomes warmer. The trail is weak (I guess because it’s an EDP), but it lasts about 7-8 hours. If it cost half as much, it would be an option, but at the current price, it’s more for collectors than the general public.
Too many expectations created, that’s the problem. It’s expected to be a wardrobe staple, and it’ll just end up on the shelf. Edit: it lasts 30 minutes on my skin.
Beyond the scent and longevity… it’s a great perfume to start a collection. Greetings from Ecuador 🇪🇨
I found it extremely pleasant. At first, it’s citrusy with woods and moss. As it evolves, a bitter, smoky note takes the lead, very rich. It’s modern with vintage touches that don’t smell old, making it a true all-rounder: casual for the day and classy for formal events. The performance is poor; it projects for about an hour and a half before sticking close to the skin. Many criticize it for this, but it’s normal for fresh fragrances. The price seems high; I’d buy it if it were between $100 and $150, but above $200, there are better options. If you find it cheap in a group buy, it’s an excellent purchase.
I smelled it in a store and it smells nice, nothing spectacular or standout, but the truth is, IT DOESN’T LAST AT ALL. Later, I saw the argument Andrés had with Jeremy Fragrance, and I completely distanced myself from that creator due to his lack of humility. I would never buy a perfume from someone so arrogant and pedantic.
For me, it’s a jewel. I ignored the negative reviews because I don’t have anyone to impress. As Andrés says, it’s a gentleman’s perfume—super fresh and delicious. If it were by Creed or a niche house, no one would criticize it. The projection is moderate but lasts well. It’s worth it for hot climates, the office, or important meetings; it’s one of my favorites for those events.
Andrés Croxatto Man. There’s no one better at pulling off a marketing stunt worthy of a Stanford thesis. I love the perfume: sometimes it lasts a short while, sometimes a long one; it’s traditional yet avant-garde; it seems both expensive and cheap. It’s a solid contradiction, just like his personality. If it had been predictable, it wouldn’t have sold so well. It was a masterstroke by the Chilean reviewer who bet everything and won. Cheers to Andrés and Carbonel.
Andrés is a marketing genius, and that’s what made us fall for it. But thank goodness I didn’t buy it; a friend who did told me it smells like generic soap, à la Calvin Klein—nothing special. In my opinion, it’s pure marketing, and the price is ridiculous.
Comparing this to Creed or Chanel? Is that a joke, really?
Just two words: pure marketing. I smelled it on a friend who splurged on it, and meh, it smells like Calvin Klein. Mind you, it’s not ugly, and neither is CK, but it’s not what Mr. Andrés claimed it would be. A matter of taste, but I don’t recommend buying it at the excessive price it commands.
Something’s wrong with that perfume, like there’s a chemical error. Mr. Andrés is a very charming YouTuber presenting fragrances; he’d even fit well on OnlyFans, but his perfume is a fiasco. It’s strange he didn’t analyze its performance before launching it.
The biggest scam in perfumery; I was subscribed to his channel until I tried the perfume and realized he knows nothing and lacks humility. It’s honestly just water, not even lasting half an hour. Don’t get fooled.
Lasts three hours and quickly fades into vanilla, losing its fougère character…
I deleted my negative review; I’m very surprised. After the first day, the perfume changed and improved tremendously; my family couldn’t believe it. The change was incredible; I suspect the shipment got hot and the smell wasn’t pleasant, but the next day it started getting better. After 5 days of daily use, I’m very happy with its pleasant, fresh, and enjoyable scent. I fell in love with the bottle and cap from minute one; they’re in my top 3, the design is a 10, and the idea of his daughter as marketing is unbeatable. I’d only improve the cap to be real metal; the magnetic one is great but maybe loses some personality. The longevity and depth behave dynamically, and I like it. Andrés did luxury with the marketing and creation; the poor guy must have sweated ink with Carbonel. I didn’t like his personality in the videos, but I appreciate that he’s fighting to change the perfume and put his stamp on it; it really didn’t suit Carbonel. I’m glad it’s a success for you. Carbonel, with COVID and no sense of smell, could do little; not hearing the final product until the Q&A video is zero professionalism, but Andrés’ hand with his magic formulas, fighting until the end, saved the perfume. Well done, what a tough bull you had to face. If you release more, we’ll be there. You’ve earned it with such a serious creation; congratulations and thanks for a well-rounded perfume.
For those on the fence, try a decant before buying. For me, it’s a great perfume with excellent aroma and quality; it doesn’t smell synthetic in the slightest. It’s so well-balanced that it feels elegant, sweet, fresh, and effortless. Ideal for cool days, semi-closed spaces, or work. Its vanilla reminds me of Layton by PDM, but with a green mossy twist—no menthol, replaced by gin. I bought a decant and was amazed by the scent.
Great scent? Yes, it’s exquisite. The big novelty Andrés sold? No, it’s generic, fresh, a bit citrusy, and mostly green—nothing new. Beast mode? Impossible; the performance is abysmal. Would I recommend it? Yes, if you find it cheap. Don’t pay the absurd €140 Croxatto price. It’s unreasonable for it to cost more than established designers with decades of success. It shouldn’t cost more than €30-40; its performance doesn’t beat anything fresh from Zara. In short: it’s the biggest fraud and scam of recent years. No designer brand has dared such a deceptive campaign, forcing you to buy blind without testing is a marketing disgrace.
It smells like Verum by Natura, especially when dry. Of course, Verum lasts three times longer. The good thing about Croxatto is the opening; it lasts about 40 minutes, then the intensity drops until it becomes a clean Verum by Natura by the two-hour mark. It’s 100% herbal, nothing gentlemanly. The strength is only in the opening; otherwise, it’s very disappointing.
At launch, it reminds me a lot of Green Irish Tweed by Creed. The dry-down is very green and woody. It smells great and won’t blow your head away, but I personally expected more in every way, though fine, those are my expectations.
Before judging the scent, let’s talk about the hate it’s receiving. Simple: it didn’t deliver on the ‘beast mode’ promise from Andrés. The marketing was brutal, and he dug the hole he’s now in. The smell is herbal and citrusy, reminiscent of Loewe 7 Aqua or Essencia. I liked it because it’s different from my usual routine, but it doesn’t aim higher than a daily wear. As Jeremy Fragrance said: ‘IS CHALLENGER’. It’s not sophisticated or extravagant, just masculine and daily. The performance is abysmal; on skin, it barely lasts 3-4 hours, nothing beast-like. The price is the most criticized aspect: the non-synthetic quality is decent, but paying the same as a designer brand is a resounding no. It’s pretentious and stays strictly daily. I love Andrés; he’s my favorite critic, but his fragrance fell short due to exaggerated advertising.
Terrible no matter how you look at it. No matter how high-quality ingredients they used, this evaporates instantly. It timidly reminded me of the fantastic Lothair at some point. For the price, it’s a rip-off.
I have it out of curiosity. A fragrance by Chris Carbonnel couldn’t be so catastrophic. And indeed, I like it. It’s super citrusy, fresh, and elegant, with a slight marine touch, its own personality, somewhat cold and very green at the start. After an hour and a half it dries down and moves to a woody, mossy, humid, and vanilla phase, super rich. It lasts about 4-6 hours on skin if you spray it generously. I recommend it if the price isn’t an issue. Maybe all the hate came from people who didn’t try it because of how it was marketed. If we don’t take as reference the miraculous longevity and exceptional trail they claimed, and value it simply for what it is, it’s a great perfume. I see it as perfect for smelling fresh and elegant at work. It doesn’t offend anyone, although one colleague finds it excessively invasive and walks away from me. It attracts compliments, if that matters. Someone from the niche asked me what perfume it was to buy it. I enjoy it as a citrus fragrance for daily use. Edit: Yesterday a colleague told me it smells like Madrileño. I’m from Teruel, so I didn’t know how to take it. I replied: ‘Thanks, I suppose’. Two hours later, he still found it invasive, even though I wore 8 sprays.
I’ve had it for over two years and it’s very rich. Women like it and it’s versatile. It’s not beast mode or long-trailing, though you might get sprayed a lot because its aroma is delicate and refined, without causing headaches. I rated it high because I believe it should sell for around $100, like JPG, because it has nothing to envy from perfumes in that range.
Personally, I like it. I haven’t received a single compliment, so if you’re looking for that, it’s not for you. I see it for people over 30 in casual wear, which limits its versatility. It also isn’t for any weather; it’s for days and afternoons. You can wear it at night, but it doesn’t shine there due to its playful gin structure. The price seemed expensive five years ago, but today, with the current market, it aligns well. As for the scent, it’s commercial: it doesn’t challenge or propose anything innovative. The only thing it has is its distribution.
In my opinion, it doesn’t deserve the hate it’s received. I have the first batch, and it’s nothing groundbreaking or disruptive. It’s a classic scent: mossy, woody, and citrusy. It’s very masculine, zero chance of being unisex. It lasts long on clothes; on skin, about 8 hours with good projection for the first two or three hours, then becomes a personal bubble. Overall it’s good, but the price is only justified because it’s from the largest Spanish-speaking YouTube reviewer. If it weren’t his, it wouldn’t be worth more than $45. Is it worth it? No, at the current price, better get a decant or have a friend gift you some sprays.
I sprayed it three times and it literally smells like a gin martini with freshly cut grass or weeds around. I get a hint of Andrés Croxatto Man. The downside: projection lasts very little, stays skin-scent, and disappears after two hours. It’s a shame because at first it seemed rare and challenging. If they had given it more longevity, it would be a great perfume.
First impressions: I tried it today, late 2025. Smells elegant and pleasant, clearly masculine and nothing generic. Starts citrusy, moves to a sweet dry-down, and finishes with a musky base that clings to the skin but persists. It doesn’t project much, but longevity is acceptable and worth trying. In three words: masculine, elegant, uncommon. Would I buy it? Yes, it’s my taste. Compliments? Yes, at least this time. Occasions? All, but especially in heat. Longevity isn’t beastly, but the scent makes it worth it. I recommend getting a decant to reapply for special events, even though the dry-down after three hours is subtly pleasant. Post-purchase edit: I already own one and have tried it several times. Despite the hate, it surprised me. It’s not a beast in projection, but if it’s elegant, it doesn’t need to be loud. On my skin, it lasts over 12 hours, even until the next morning. The base is musky with a touch of moss that adds freshness. I highlight its trail: refreshing bursts throughout the day thanks to the moss. The quality of the raw materials is above average; it smells very natural and harmonious. I compare it to other designer fragrances sharing notes, and the difference is noticeable. I don’t question others’ experience if it doesn’t work for them, but it does for me. It’s ideal for spring, where fresh moss blends with the warmth of vanilla and musk. Can it be a signature? Yes, if the budget allows; the price is convenient for niche. But like clothes, you don’t wear the same thing always; I recommend pairing it with something fresher for extreme heat and less vanilla for autumn.
A good fragrance with quality, though many expected something more mainstream and sweet. It’s not; its inspirations are Green Irish Tweed and Acqua di Gio. It makes sense to create a green hybrid with grapefruit and neroli. Being so natural, don’t expect it to last as long as an Arabic perfume.
Smells rich and fresh, somehow reminding me of that Caribbean rice and beans dish; longevity is average, but the only real flaw is the atomizer.