Skip to content

Especially Escada Elixir by Escada

Women 2013

Brand
Escada

Description

Especially Escada Elixir by Escada is an oriental floral fragrance for women. Launched in 2013, the nose behind this composition is Jean-Michel Duriez. The top notes are pear, grapefruit, and ambrette musk; the heart notes are Turkish rose, plum, prune, and ylang-ylang; and the base notes are patchouli, white musk, cashmere wood, amber, and Madagascar vanilla.

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 16%
  • Spring 33%
  • Summer 22%
  • Autumn 30%
  • Day 65%
  • Night 35%

Key notes

Community

809 votes

  • Positive 70%
  • Negative 27%
  • Neutral 2.7%
positive reviews 809 community votes
LongevityModerate SillageModerate Best momentDay CharacterFeminine

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I own it

1,551 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Spring

608 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Day

356 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About Especially Escada Elixir

Main accord rosy Year 2013 Gender Women Perfumer Jean-Michel Duriez

Especially Escada Elixir by Escada is an oriental floral fragrance for women. Launched in 2013, the nose behind this composition is Jean-Michel Duriez. The top notes are pear, grapefruit, and ambrette musk; the heart notes are Turkish rose, plum, prune, and ylang-ylang; and the base notes are patchouli, white musk, cashmere wood, amber, and Madagascar vanilla.

Fruits, vegetables and nuts Musk, amber and animalic Flowers Woods and mosses

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Moderate

282 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Moderate

365 votes

Character

Leading answer Traditionally feminine

92 votes

Value perception

Leading answer Fair price

83 votes

Community reviews

19 reviews

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review

Add your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk.

Your rating optional
Your take, in one line optional
Your take, in one line

  1. What a find! I bought it blindly based on the price and absolutely loved it. I enjoy that delicate touch of rose, musk, and patchouli, although I didn’t detect the fruits they claim to have. The only downside is that it fades very quickly on my skin.

    Reply
  2. I bought it blind thanks to a significant discount; lately, that’s how I discover perfumes, since the original version wasn’t in stock. I’m not an expert in fragrances or notes, just a passionate enthusiast. The opening was intense and I didn’t like it much; I felt it was synthetic, somewhat reminiscent of a bathroom disinfectant, perhaps due to the ambrette musk. After an hour, the Turkish roses became noticeable, and at four hours, close to the skin, it smelled soft and talcum-like, similar to the original. For now, it’s a no; I think it will be hard for me to wear it.

    Reply
  3. I bought it because it was on sale since the original wasn’t available. I’m not an expert, but the opening smelled very synthetic to me, almost like disinfectant. By mid-day, it smelled like Turkish rose, and in the end, it was soft and powdery. For now, I’m not using it; I don’t think I’ll like it.

    Reply
  4. The bottle is gorgeous—it’s not the typical feminine design and really catches the eye. The scent starts with very potent Turkish rose, then settles into plum with a powdery touch. It lasts about four hours. It’s only for the brave due to the strong opening. Better to try it before buying.

    Reply
  5. I was drawn in by the bottle and the promotion. It smells sweet, fruity, and rose-like, very feminine and refined. The salesperson said it was potent, and it is at the start. I enjoy wearing it in cool weather; I think it feels overwhelming in the summer because of how sweet it is.

    Reply
  6. The bottle caught my eye and it was on promotion. It comes out very sweet, with sweet fruits and roses. It has a fine, delicate, feminine aroma. The saleswoman said it was potent, and yes, it is in the opening. I enjoy it a lot in cold weather; in summer, I think it might be overwhelming because it’s quite sweet.

    Reply
  7. Finally, I got my hands on it. I already own rose perfumes, but this Escada one is the freshest and most youthful. On my skin, it feels fresh, a bit synthetic, but it wears beautifully. It lasts long and is elegant. It smells like a brand-new wrist to me.

    Reply
  8. magucha arg

    I bought it blindly because it was cheap. At first, it didn’t convince me, but I gave it another chance and ended up liking it. The opening is bitter and synthetic (I assume it’s the ambrette musk). Then the rose comes in with a hint of acidic fruit, and that bitterness lingers. It’s silky until the musk joins in. Very good, but it fades fast.

    Reply
  9. I snagged it blindly thanks to an ridiculous deal, and it was a hit. The opening is a strong citrus, grapefruit with ambrette, creating an exotic halo. Then the roses arrive with the acidity of plum. Finally, it adds a more delicate amber touch. Interestingly, those roses with plum are always bathed in grapefruit; very original. The bottle doesn’t really represent the perfume, but it lasts 6 hours, the sillage is moderate, and the price is excellent. I’d buy it again.

    Reply
  10. I bought it blind during a super promotion at an unbelievable price, and it was a hit. The opening is citrusy, feeling grapefruit fused with ambrette, creating an exotic and unconventional halo. A few minutes later, the roses appear, accompanied by the acidity and soft sweetness of plums. Finally, an amber touch adds delicacy and elegance. The curious part is that those delicious ‘plum-tinged’ roses are constantly immersed in grapefruit, something original that works really well. The bottle isn’t ugly, but it doesn’t truly represent the perfume. Longevity on my skin is about 6 hours with moderate sillage. The price is excellent. I loved it and would buy it again.

    Reply
  11. This review is from a very hot summer. The opening is slightly acidic, which makes it interesting when fruits are usually ripe and sweet. It’s a sharp, fresh grapefruit note that makes you frown, supported by soft floral and musky undertones. After two minutes, the rose emerges: ripe, very refreshed by the grapefruit but not citrusy, without green notes. It’s soft, not creamy. The musk adds roundness without being that silky Narciso Rodríguez vibe (I bought it because people voted it similar to For Her Fleur Musc; it has a bit of that spirit but isn’t an alternative). It could be a fresh, light version of Fleur Musc. After two or three hours, I notice an amber touch that adds a sweet roundness, balancing the acidic fruit without losing freshness. There’s also a bit of patchouli adding depth. It achieves the perfect balance between refreshing grapefruit, barely ripe rose, and the sweetness of amber. Ideal for summer: a fresh floral rose scent that doesn’t fall into the typical young-citrus-green soap note (I’m not a huge fan). It’s fresh and summery without being too casual, with subtle complexity. If it had better longevity, it would unfold more interesting accords, a beautiful complexity. It feels very chic, for a stylish woman without complicated styling, lively and spirited but not rigid. It doesn’t seem synthetic; the grapefruit and rose are realistic, though the musk and amber can be a bit artificial. I was surprised and happy to have bought it. The only downside is it doesn’t last long: 3-4 hours with heavy application, maybe due to the summer heat. In autumn-winter, it might shift and show more of its amber side and that vanilla note it mentions. Hopefully.

    Reply
  12. This review is from a hot summer. The opening is a bit tart, which is interesting since fruits are usually sweet, but it’s a fresh grapefruit that makes you raise an eyebrow, supported by a soft floral and musky base. The rose comes out in two minutes, mature and refreshed by the grapefruit, without green notes. It’s soft, not creamy. The musk adds softness, not that Narciso-like silkiness. I bought it because people voted it similar to For Her Fleur Musc; it has some of that spirit but isn’t an alternative. It could be a fresh, light version. After two or three hours, an amber note emerges that balances the tartness without losing freshness, plus a bit of patchouli that adds depth. It achieves the perfect balance between grapefruit, mature rose, and sweetness. It’s ideal for summer—a fresh floral that doesn’t slip into soapy territory. It’s chic, suits a stylish, lively woman without being rigid. It doesn’t feel synthetic to me; the grapefruit and rose are realistic, though the musk and amber might be a bit artificial. I was pleasantly surprised. The downside is it doesn’t last long, only 3-4 hours even with heavy application. Maybe in autumn or winter it would show more of its amber and vanilla side. Wish it would!

    Reply
  13. Ssilvinabent

    I tested it in the perfumery, and the saleswoman tried to sell it to me as ‘the power version’ of the traditional Special (which I love), and got offended when I told her they didn’t seem similar to me. I opted for the classic, but I ended up bringing this one home instead. It’s sweeter (due to the vanilla) and doesn’t resemble the traditional version. What they added feels like darkness and masculinity; they hardened it, losing the youthful, innocent, fresh, and fun character of the classic, so it lost its charm. Also, to be an ‘Elixir’, it lasts the same or less than the classic. Fun fact: in the sample I brought home, the next day it smelled like a men’s perfume. I don’t like it; I recommend the original version.

    Reply
  14. Ssilvinabent

    The salesperson tried to sell it to me as the more potent version of the classic Especially (which I like) and got offended when I said they weren’t similar. I opted for the classic, but I ended up bringing this one home. It’s sweeter due to the vanilla and doesn’t resemble the original at all. I feel they added darkness and masculinity, hardening it. It lost its youthful, innocent, and fun charm. Also, for an Elixir, it lasts the same or less than the classic. Fun fact: the next day, it smelled like a men’s perfume in the dryer. I don’t like it; I recommend the original.

    Reply
  15. I didn’t like it at all. It was strong, artificial, and synthetic. It reminded me a lot of Dior Addict Eau Delice, which I also didn’t like. On top of that, it lasted forever, haha.

    Reply
  16. I didn’t like it at all. Strong, artificial, synthetic smell. It reminded me a lot of Dior Addict Eau Delice, which I also didn’t like. And on top of that, it lasted a long time, haha.

    Reply
  17. I love it. It’s light and not overly sweet; smells clean and I use it a lot during the day.

    Reply
  18. I bought it yesterday after searching for it for a while. On my skin, it smells spectacularly clean and lasts a long time. I previously owned the original version and liked it, but I save this one for the evening. The rose feels modern and intense on me. It’s rare for a perfume to turn out badly on my skin chemistry, but this one truly pleased me.

    Reply
  19. I’m giving it another try. I tested it on my skin for fifteen minutes, but with Escada I noticed the scent shifts and becomes sweeter. Either way, I liked it. It’s sweet but very appropriate for this spring.

    Reply