Skip to content

Paradoxe by Pierre Cardin

Women 1983

Perfumer
Robert Gonnon

Description

Paradoxe by Pierre Cardin is a floral chypre fragrance for women. Launched in 1983, this composition was created by Raymond Chaillan and Robert Gonnon. The top notes unfold with a vibrant citrus accord featuring Amalfi lemon, bergamot, and mandarin. The floral and spicy heart is built around neroli, hyacinth, ylang-ylang, jasmine, and iris. The base reveals a deep woody and…

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 33%
  • Spring 16%
  • Summer 6.1%
  • Autumn 45%
  • Day 52%
  • Night 48%

Key notes

Community

179 votes

  • Positive 82%
  • Negative 12%
  • Neutral 5.6%
positive reviews 179 community votes
LongevityModerate SillageModerate Best momentAutumn CharacterUnisex

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I own it

635 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Autumn

148 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Day

90 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About Paradoxe

Main accord amber Year 1983 Gender Women Perfumer Raymond Chaillan · Robert Gonnon

Paradoxe by Pierre Cardin is a floral chypre fragrance for women. Launched in 1983, this composition was created by Raymond Chaillan and Robert Gonnon. The top notes unfold with a vibrant citrus accord featuring Amalfi lemon, bergamot, and mandarin. The floral and spicy heart is built around neroli, hyacinth, ylang-ylang, jasmine, and iris. The base reveals a deep woody and animalic character with leather, oakmoss, incense, musk, pepper, and amber.

White flowers Flowers Musk, amber and animalic Woods and mosses Spices

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Moderate

72 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Moderate

90 votes

Character

Leading answer Balanced

34 votes

Value perception

Tied for the lead Good value / Excellent value

24 votes

Community reviews

1 review

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review

Add your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk.

Your rating optional
Your take, in one line optional
Your take, in one line

  1. But what gives? Is there not a single review for Paradoxe by Pierre Cardin? I can’t take it anymore, so here I go. I get the paradox in its name. Designed for women, yet so masculine. That’s pure paradox. If you lived through the eighties, it might not seem as strange to you as it does to me today. Back then, many women liked to smell like men (think Cacharel Pour L’Homme), and many men did well in a fragrance that was clearly feminine—something unthinkable in recent decades. Looking back, this perfume has been touched up, no doubt. But like anyone else here, how can you resist the temptation to buy a bottle at the price I found it and wander through experiences etched in memory, hoping to relive a special moment with a sniff? I would have loved to say epic things about this perfume, probably because those were the feelings I had back then, but I can’t. I don’t know if it’s the memory, fashion changes, or the (certain) reformulations; however paradoxical it may seem, it wasn’t special enough to escape them. I remember it much drier, leathery, and smokier than the soapy sensation I have today, which feels like a solid bar of barber soap. Maybe the note balance changed, favoring the floral notes like hyacinth and jasmine, which were more acidic back in the day, and leaving behind the leather, oakmoss, and incense that I recall as a dry, smoky punch that gave it mysterious audacity (juhuahua) and took away the soapy vibe. Anyway, Paradoxe was created for women, but never, then or now, has it smelled remotely feminine. So I feel bold recommending it to men, especially now that they’re wearing things that have nothing to do with them, like Chanel No. 5. It has to be admitted that it improves as it dries, or at least gains complexity. More smoke, less soap. But I have to say that at this point, I don’t find anything special in it anymore. That said, I have the huge satisfaction of having tried it and of having a bottle that hasn’t changed its appearance in so many years, which brings me memories of bygone times just by holding it. It’s like a piece of happy history. Recommended for people with weird tastes like… ‘I want to smell (on me or someone else) like Dr. Schmeckler’s Dr. Schmeckler shaving soap when Churchill was a corporal and there was nothing else.’ In that case, it’s ideal and essential. Go for it!

    Reply