Wings for Men by Giorgio Beverly Hills
Men 1994
Main accords
Description
Wings for Men by Giorgio Beverly Hills is an aromatic fougère fragrance for men. Launched in 1994, this composition was created by perfumer Jean-Claude Delville. Upon release, it unfolds a vibrant freshness thanks to lavender, green notes, bergamot, neroli, and lemon; the heart reveals a floral woody accord with jasmine, geranium, valley lily, statice, and cilantro; while the base settles…
Show more ↓Quick summary
The olfactory pyramid
A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.
The community speaks
Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.
In the collection
Leading answer I own it
1,532 votes
What do you think?
Leading answer Like it
595 votes
Season
Choose severalLeading answer Summer
678 votes
Time of day
Choose severalLeading answer Day
349 votes
Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.
Fragrance profile
About Wings for Men
Wings for Men by Giorgio Beverly Hills is an aromatic fougère fragrance for men. Launched in 1994, this composition was created by perfumer Jean-Claude Delville. Upon release, it unfolds a vibrant freshness thanks to lavender, green notes, bergamot, neroli, and lemon; the heart reveals a floral woody accord with jasmine, geranium, valley lily, statice, and cilantro; while the base settles on a warm and persistent foundation of amber, tonka bean, musk, oakmoss, and cedar.
Flowers Green, herbal and fougère White flowers Musk, amber and animalic Spices Woods and mosses
It may remind you of
Ranked by what the community voted.
More from Giorgio Beverly Hills
More from Jean Claude Delville
How it wears
Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.
Longevity
Leading answer Long-lasting
309 votes
Sillage
Leading answer Moderate
348 votes
Character
Leading answer Traditionally masculine
158 votes
Value perception
Leading answer Excellent value
154 votes
Most talked about
Notes and topics that come up most in 37 reviews.
Featured review The most detailed of the latest reviews.
Have you worn Wings for Men?
Tell us how it opens, how it settles on your skin, how long it lasts and when you wear it.
Sort by
xelkor
I’ve been hunting for perfumes from this house for ages, and now that they’re accessible, finding something ‘vintage’ was a total hit. Wings caught me by surprise: for under €9 for 50ml, it’s a summer proposal with an 80s soul. It’s not aquatic; it’s fresh and aromatic. The opening is a green punch, Hulk-style, which might give you a headache at first, but it settles within a minute to reveal a floral with cold lavender, a bit synthetic but well-done. It has a controlled sweetness that harmonizes everything. The longevity is good, but the trail is a beast: the first hour floods the room and can cause headaches, so be careful with the spray—less is more. I’d wear it all year, maybe except winter, during the day, though it has enough body to wear at night without issues.
Alex_Rex
First review of this house, and it’s Giorgio Beverly Hills’ Wings for Men. It’s the epitome of herbal-citrus: the projection is explosive for the first hour before calming down to become moderate. It gives a lot of vitality thanks to that herbal-citrus mix with lavender. Longevity is average, about 5 or 6 hours, where you notice the coriander and oakmoss with cedar at the end. In my opinion, it’s ideal for autumn and spring; in summer, it might be overwhelming due to its potency and is better for daytime. It can also be worn at night, but I don’t recommend it as much. It has that vintage touch that makes it perfect for the office or a suit, conveying neatness and masculinity. In short, it’s vintage but doesn’t smell old, works for any occasion, has powerful projection and moderate longevity that will revitalize you and bring you compliments.
iorelk
I’ve been looking for it for years, only remembering the bottle. I smelled it in 1995 when I was almost a child with an inexperienced nose, but it left me with a delicious memory. Now that I’ve tried blue fragrances, it brings to mind nothing more than Dylan Blue, Nautica Voyage, and the Añgo de Fierce.
guchita
I bought Wings to gift to my husband and also the women’s version. I think it’s the same as with Eternity: the men’s version smells clean, very green and masculine. It’s fresh, ideal for summer. I can’t find an aquatic aroma. At first, a slightly rancid note dirties the combination, but then it dissipates, leaving a neat perfume. Longevity is 8 hours.
lefabrizio
I bought it because I’m a fan and nostalgic for the 90s and knew I had this scent. I still can’t talk much about performance yet, but it’s doing quite well. Totally masculine. I’m surprised no one compares it to Eternity in its EDP version. I feel it’s totally green, slightly spicy, with a barely sweet base that rounds it out. I see it as very similar to Eternity but with more punch. If I had to compare it, it’s close to the classic Eternity EDT and EDP, with faint brushstrokes of Cool Water and Dylan Blue. Anyway, I’ll test it more and update. I’m already in love with the aroma; it reminded me of when I was a kid. EDIT: it’s spectacular. It’s Eternity but aquatic and with better performance. If you like 90s scents, go for it.
anybyt
I bought it for my husband and ended up using it myself because I love it. It’s fresh, clean, and persistent, combining very well with any fruity and sweet perfume. I love the combination!
wildkatzen
Let’s go back to 1994, when Real McCoy and Mariah Carey were playing non-stop. This fragrance came to compete with Cool Water. Although it was 60% similar, it was ideal for hot days. If we bought it today, in 2024, it would smell generic, like Nautica or many blues, perhaps a bit lighter, but very versatile, smelling clean, and girls love this type of aroma in men. I’ve bought Giorgio Men several times because few have copied it, and it has power and classic interest.
naso_en_ciernes
Wings is like a unicorn. Many compare it to Cool Water, but I think it’s synthetic, plastic, and piercing, going for the Joop! Homme style—not by aroma but by concept and formula construction. It’s not marine, nor citrus, nor floral, or it’s all of that at once. The opening is piercing (the first time I thought you had to be careful), authentically 90s, thinking about how they imagined an alien perfume back then. It’s one of the most peculiar in my collection (I like them, obviously); I don’t use it much because I can’t find the occasion, though it’s daytime for temperate weather and can also be winter, it’s versatile. The price is a gift, made in USA, and that peculiar blue bottle could last a long time. It projects normally, lasts normally, but with heat it can still give bursts; it doesn’t die easily. It’s an aroma for personal appreciation, not to please everyone. Low cost but with a tough air, challenging, with its own personality that doesn’t want to get lost in the sea of freshies. Giorgio Beverly Hills came very close to Jacques Bogart’s idea. I’m wearing it today and wonder where that oakmoss hint comes from (one of my favorite notes), and it’s the Wings itself that keeps surprising, even when it’s fading on the skin.
iorelk
When I was a child, its scent enchanted me. I loved it. Later, I smelled Nautica Classic, and it reminded me of it a lot. Recently, I bought a cologne like Esss Fraiche, the Dylan Blue, and I loved it; this fragrance came to mind. I got a similar scent, and then I read that Wings is like an affordable version of Dylan Blue. On the other hand, I’ve had the original Eternity and Cool Water; honestly, I don’t feel them as similar, a bit like Cool Water but more like Dylan Blue.
Gentil vagabond
Now and always, it’s hard to understand; it’s a sweet-aquatic-citrus opening… weird… and a dry-down that projects cleanliness. It’s not a bad perfume, but it’s not for everyone; I’ll always give it a second chance, though you have to know the situation to use it. I’d define it as love and hate; many people are impacted by it, while others can’t handle it.
Gentil vagabond
Now and Again is hard to pin down; it’s a sweet-aquatic-citrus opening… weird. The drydown projects cleanliness; it’s not bad but not for everyone. I always give it a second chance, though you need to know how to use it. I’d define it as love-hate; it impacted some people strongly while others just couldn’t handle it.
juma
Caramelized apple and laundry softener, with no green notes here. Maybe a hint of lavender at the end that sometimes sounds pseudo-aquatic. Imagine walking through an afternoon fair with caramelized apple, freshly showered, and clean clothes that just got a bit too much softener. Good longevity and sillage, but if you over-spray, you’ll get a bit of a headache because it’s ultra-clean.
beto_ruiz
Wings for Men is aromatic, aquatic, and fougère. The opening is harsh and synthetic, lavender with green notes like pine or juniper. Over time it mellows, the intensity drops, and floral notes like geranium emerge, along with a woody accord of tonka bean, musk, and amber—very much in the fresh 90s style. You can tell it’s old; it’s not bad, but those who loved 90s aquatics like Cool Water or Polo Sport will enjoy it more. It’s affordable, so don’t expect much from its quality, which is inferior to those references. Longevity is good, lasting over 8 hours with decent projection.
beto_ruiz
Wings for Men is an aquatic aromatic fougere. The opening is a bit harsh and synthetic, smelling of lavender and green notes like pine or juniper. Over time, it becomes more pleasant, the initial intensity drops, and floral notes like geranium emerge, along with a woody accord of tonka bean, musk, and amber, very much in the fresh 90s style. It’s clearly aged, but not bad; I think those who enjoyed aquatic scents from back then like Cool Water, Aqua Quorum, or Polo Sport will appreciate it more. It’s quite affordable, so you don’t need to be too demanding on quality, which I believe is inferior to the ones mentioned. The longevity is good, lasting over 8 hours with decent projection.
Eugenio444
Sometimes it has a sweet touch, but I don’t see it as unisex. Everyone chooses what they like, but if we follow what’s associated with feminine or masculine, this leans masculine. Yes, it has sweetness and a hint of vanilla. The scent overall feels synthetic; the lavender, citrus, and florals create an extreme, very heavy sense of cleanliness. Wings is strong and heavy. High projection for the first three hours, then moderate, but it’s noticeable all day and even the next. It’s not for everyone, especially compared to what’s available today for millennials (who advertise heavy scents at the start that then disappear). With Wings, the story is different: it’s a powerhouse fragrance, worthy of an era where fragrances had real body and undeniable quality. These are the heavy scents that you hate at first if you over-spray, until you get used to them and start liking them, until they become part of you. Dear millennials, if you want something real, go back to decades before 2000 to feel a true fragrance.
smellgood
This fragrance is a total hit; I absolutely love it. It’s brought me the most compliments. I usually don’t wear perfumes just for flattery but for what they convey, but I have to say it’s excellent. In cool or windy weather, it fades quickly and doesn’t project as much, and while it’s not its best in the heat and the drydown is a bit weak, it still smells great.
smellgood
I can’t analyze it well because I love it; it’s the one that gets me the most compliments. I usually don’t wear perfumes for compliments but for what they convey, but I must tell you it’s very good. In strong wind, it seems to evaporate faster in cool or cold environments; it’s phenomenal, extremely pleasant, and sparkling. In hot weather, it’s not its best presentation and leaves much to be desired, though it still smells phenomenal, it just doesn’t showcase its phenomenal dry-down.
SMELL
Ugh, I remember meeting it thanks to a sample in a fashion magazine back in the mid-90s. I love it. Now that I’m looking it up on Fragrantica to buy it, even though I have a vague memory of the scent, I perfectly recall the feeling: cleanliness and happiness. It’s one of those fragrances you fall in love with easily, turning it into your signature or at least one of your most frequent wears. A fantastically crafted fragrance.
SMELL
YIKES! I first encountered this in a fashion magazine sample back in the mid-90s. I love it. Now that I’m looking it up on Fragrantica, I want to buy one because, even though I only have a vague memory of the scent, I remember the feeling perfectly: cleanliness and happiness. It’s one of those fragrances you fall in love with quickly, making it a perfect signature scent or a frequent daily wear. A wonderfully crafted perfume.
BadCat77
Strong scent; the only downside is that it moves very quickly into cedar and woods, which is delicious, but you’d wish to smell the citrus notes like bergamot a bit more, maybe cilantro is a bit too dominant. Very good perfume.
Oscar López
I had this at launch and it was a huge boom, just like Cool Water was then, or Invictus and Sauvage are now. I bought it again two years ago, and honestly, if you want to smell like fabric softener, buy it. I ended up using it to scent my bed sheets instead.
Oscar López
I had it at launch and it was a boom, just like Cool Water was then, and like Invictus or Sauvage are now. I bought it again two years ago, and honestly, if you want to smell like laundry softener, buy it. I ended up using it to scent my bed sheets.
jerry drake
An aquatic proposal but dense, spicy with a powerful and intrusive opening that made me hesitate a bit. In the first hour, the sillage is elevated. Over time, it reveals its true essence; it’s synthetic, but there’s something that hooks you and makes you enjoy it. I like it quite a bit in the more relaxed middle phase, but it’s always strong and present. It has uncommon longevity, so don’t over-apply or you’ll flood everything (if you take the subway with 6 sprays, people on the whole train will smell it). Anecdote: I invited friends I hadn’t seen in a while to dinner; the youngest girl approached, after the hug and a kiss, she whispered with a little smile: ‘You smell so good.’ Anyway, refreshing with spicy and sweet touches, not bad, and with surprising performance.
Carlos Luis
Very potent… no one can help but say you poured the whole bottle on yourself… but in the end, it’s a great scent, it brings back a lot of college memories… excellent price and I’ll definitely buy it again.
Darkbeat
These days, fresh fragrances tend to be ethereal and bodyless—sometimes long-lasting but with poor projection. Anything that breaks away from that minimalism is extraordinary. This Wings is like an elephant in a china shop: it doesn’t go unnoticed; it’s truly worthy of its era. As Bofifa says, it’s a crystal-clear scent with warm, woody lavender, pristine and sharp musk like neon lights, possessing an ancient beauty. It’s a radioactive vintage freshie that I absolutely love. I smell it as a mix of Alfred Dunhill Desire, Nikos Sculpture, a touch of Cool Water, and a hint of enriched plutonium: scandalous, jovial, and just a little mature. Performance is good; it lasts longer than average with a striking trail in the first hour. It’s for daytime and warm weather. For me, it’s perfect for a summer afternoon. I recommend it without hesitation, but only to people who like scents like Sculpture or Mystique Homme; otherwise, stay away.
Bofifa
Reviewing Wings is like trying to capture the most strident, exhibitionist spirit of the 90s, for better or worse. It’s not a perfume for everyone; it’s an all-or-nothing experience that only makes sense in its own time. It inevitably takes me back to 1996, when I’d take the early train to stroll around campus wearing this scent. Today, using it brings back exact, indescribable feelings from that youth. It was a gift, not a choice, just like the other perfumes of that era. The opening is effervescent and artificial, a rare mix of lavender, bergamot, and musk that screams ‘ultra-clean.’ You have to decide: either you’re hooked or you’re repulsed. It doesn’t fit well into current categories, neither aquatic nor floral, but in the dry-down it shines with sweet notes, woods, and a fruity cleanliness that projects and lasts longer than the average ‘freshie.’ That aura of extreme neatness makes me think of a trilogy with Sculpture and Versace Blue Jeans. It’s the most hated perfume I love the most.
chamuco638
So, if it arrived as a generic gift, I’d rather stick with Swiss Army.
Baxter
Wings had its golden moment in the 90s with that sweet, youthful, catchy character—fresh and very aromatic. It brings back good memories of my younger years; it’s easy to remember and distinguish. Now, with age, it seems very synthetic at first, but it becomes pleasant as it dries. I wouldn’t wear it at forty, but it’s a great option for young people looking for something eye-catching with great longevity and sillage at a ridiculous price. It’s a way to break up the bombardment of fragrances young people face today. It reminds me a bit of Perry Ellis 360, though Wings has more zip. Nothing like Eternity. In short: sweetened, pleasant, not cloying, excellent price, and a cute bottle.
Baxter
Wings had its golden moment in the 90s with that sweet, youthful, and catchy character—fresh and highly aromatic. It brings back good memories of my younger years; it’s easy to remember and distinguish. Now, with age, it seems very synthetic at first, but dries down nicely. I wouldn’t wear it at forty, but it’s a great option for younger folks looking for something eye-catching with great longevity and projection at a ridiculous price. It’s a nice way to break up the bombardment of fragrances young people face today. It reminds me a bit of Perry Ellis 360, though Wings has more zip. Nothing like Eternity. In short: sugary, pleasant, not cloying, excellent price, and a cute bottle.
30 of 37