Men
Oscar de la Renta Pour Lui
Acordes principales
Descripción
Oscar de la Renta Pour Lui by Oscar de la Renta is a leather fragrance for men. Launched in 1980, this composition features top notes of aldehydes, lavender, juniper berries, basil, galbanum, sage, caraway, anise, and bergamot. The heart reveals carnation, patchouli, cinnamon, geranium, cedar, vetiver, and cyclamen, while the base settles on oakmoss, leather, labdanum, sandalwood, and musk.
Resumen rápido
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Oscar de la Renta Pour Lui y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
40 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
I have two versions: the reformulated and the original—though I’m not sure how many reformulations there actually are. The reformulated one is just a cologne, while the original is much stronger than before, a bomb of scents that ends in woods with patchouli. They classify it as ‘leather,’ but to me, that’s iso-butyl quinoline with florals; it’s more like Chanel’s Russian Leather or Knize 10. This isn’t iso-butyl quinoline—this is spices (anise) with florals (geranium, heavy roses), plus other elements that end up in something very original but not at all to my liking. It’s fine if you want to try something novel despite its age, though I think that’s what gives it a few negative points. After all, modern scents don’t offer much surprise these days.
This fragrance isn’t bad at all. It’s like Invictus or One Million from the 80s: you slap it on and you fill the room with that bold scent to stand out. It’s a classic Latin lover vibe, a perfect 80s throwback for that era.
This perfume is trash, do not buy it. It smells like synthetic lavender from floor cleaner, it never develops, you have to press your nose right against your arm to catch it, and it doesn’t last at all. It’s the perfect example of a cheap, bad perfume; they should have discontinued it long ago.
A true old-school fragrance. As they say, it smells like a gentleman; picture someone in a suit.
Amazing. What a powerhouse scent.
They’re from almost the same decade, the 80s or 81, alongside Chanel Antaeus, so I’m not sure which one is the clone… to me, they smell practically identical. I liked the fragrance.
Exquisite fragrance. You can definitely detect the aldehydes, lavender, and oakmoss as the dominant notes on my skin. Acceptable longevity, good projection. Ideal for night and a bit of cold weather.
I’ve tried both the vintage and current versions, and frankly, the current one leaves much to be desired. The vintage was an amazing soapy 80s classic with clear notes of geranium, oakmoss, leather, and lavender. Plus, its performance was excellent. For years now, they’ve sold a version not made in France with a slightly different bottle, but the real difference is in the scent (it’s softer) and especially the longevity (it lasts about half an hour on my skin). That’s why I don’t recommend the current version; it feels like they ruined it with a terrible reformulation.
I loved it! Bought it blind following recommendations here… thanks! It reminds me a lot of the classic Azzaro. The scent is very pleasant and the longevity is more than enough.
Another 80s bomb. We complain that nowadays all fragrances are too sweet and ‘similar,’ but that’s nothing new. In the 70s, 80s, 90s, and 2000s, it happened too, just on a larger scale. It’s true that back then they were heavier on ingredients and more complex, but they also ‘copied’ and reworked fragrances from other houses. Examples include this type of Antaeus-cut fragrances: Pour Lui, Pour Homme by Van Cleef, Quorum… They are all similar yet disparate, moving almost in unison. The same will happen with Eau de Sauvage, YSL Pour Homme, Boucheron Pour Homme, Chanel Pour Monsieur… in another era. This Pour Lui sits halfway between the fragrances it versions. The Van Cleef one revolves around rose with that coconut touch. Antaeus goes more for the animal side. Quorum leans more towards green and tobacco. Pour Lui is more aromatic and aldehydic. That’s why I say they are similar at first but very different from each other. Among these 80s-style fragrances, for me, the undisputed queen is Antaeus. I think it has the class and sophistication that the others lack (or at least, I don’t consider them sophisticated). I can’t speak about the version sold now because I don’t know it. I have one from the late 80s, and that’s the one I’m basing this review on.
Not at all, old school isn’t my style.
An old school cut fougere, clean, and its opening might remind you a bit of Chanel’s Antaeus, without the animal touch and, in my opinion, with significantly less depth. That said, for a fraction of the price, it remains interesting if you like this type of aroma.
I can’t believe I wanted to trade it in. When I first smelled it, Versace L’homme came to mind, and I was a bit disappointed because I wanted something different. It didn’t satisfy me, plus I tested it on summer days. Bad idea. This fragrance is for cold weather. The other day, the afternoon rain refreshed the air; you could tell autumn was knocking on the door, which excites me because I love this season. One night, as I was going to bed, it whispered, ‘psst, psst, hey, give me a chance, let me spend the night with you.’ And so it did; I sprayed it three times and got into bed. We reconciled. Sometimes we meet people in the wrong place and time and judge them based on their behavior in that circumstance. The same goes for perfumes. That happened with Pour Lui; it wasn’t our time, and I didn’t appreciate it, my fault. Now, now, its soapy lavender, its moss, and its leather accompany me, giving me warmth, while its woody forest notes make me feel elegant and special. I’m glad to have it; it will be an essential this autumn.
Pour Lui is clearly inspired by Antaeus, almost clones. Suddenly, in the dry-down, it reminds me of Cartier’s Santos without the coconut note. It’s a refined barbershop fragrance with woody/sweet nuances, lacking the musky quality of Antaeus. It’s heavy at first but softens as it evolves; as it changes, it feels like a strange, sweet, yet irresistible incense. Performance is moderate (even being a late-90s vintage formula); I expected more of a beast, but hey, you can smell it for 6-7 hours, and that’s a great deal considering I grabbed it on eBay for $16 for 90ml. It has a wide, well-dispersing atomizer. Vintage versions are available at good prices if you compare them to others in this category selling at outrageous prices, like old Kouros or Antaeus. My conclusion: if you’re unsure or don’t want to spend what Antaeus costs, go for this.
Good performance. Proper vintage, an 80s soapy, gentlemanly scent with a clean smell. Totally valid to wear today. I like it, very well; it suits anyone over 30. Highly recommended, mostly because of the price. If you’re into the 80s vibe and want to smell like a real man, this is it. An alpha male silver-lion perfume, but you can wear it today without offending sensitive noses that are used to the trash from Paco Rabanne and Carolina Herrera—those sugary things that smell like air fresheners.
I’m 39 years old, and this 1980 perfume feels incredibly elegant and delicious to me. I loved it! It’s a different kind of bet and a very masculine scent.
Terrible performance and projection; smells like soap. If you want to smell like soap, this is it. I bought the US-made version and I do NOT recommend it. It’s way too weak, it’s an Eau de Cologne, not an Eau de Toilette. It smells like cheap perfume. If you want to overpay for the same performance as a 5-euro bottle but in a pretty glass, this is your guy. I bought it blind thinking it was wonderful, but it’s not. The new reformulations aren’t spectacular at all. I’m complaining online to get them to improve the product because it’s depressing. I admit the dry-down feels different, but you only notice it up close; people won’t even notice you’re wearing it, let alone say how good it smells. At most, in the first few minutes, someone might say, ‘Hey, you smell like soap,’ and that’s only right after spraying and from 50 cm away.
Whether it’s old school or not, if it is, it’s for men, not for weaklings who love little sugary things.
Old school that blows your mind. Spectacular perfume, but watch out: if you’re into Dylan Blue or Chanel Blue, better skip this.
A classic with that sharp, powder-room sweetness. Old school only; not for sensitive noses.
When I want to smell lavender, patchouli, and leather, I reach for this exquisite Pour Lui by Oscar de la Renta. It smells clean, it’s a delight with lasting longevity and strong sillage. It’s a refined work of art in perfumery. Cheers.
I was genuinely surprised by how sweet it is, at least for me. The opening is strong but settles quickly. Smells like Ted Lapidus but more refined. It feels timeless; if a niche brand released this today, people would pay triple digits. I’m talking about the original formula (I’ll compare it to the new one someday). The dry-down surprised me, and after wearing it a couple of times, I know I’ll never run out. I have the 10ml mini with the old logo; it’s cheap and the size is perfect. The brand really stepped up here, unlike those 1.5ml samples which are absolute trash. That’s why I respect it.
A vintage leather fragrance that must be in every wardrobe. Its floral and aromatic notes blend seamlessly with dry woods and aldehydes. On my skin and clothes, it’s spectacular. I recommend it to classic men looking for masculine and complex scents.
At least the 1980 Sanofi version, very soapy, resembles Paco Rabanne Pour Homme more. It has nothing of Antaeus (castoreum), nor VC&A (rose and leather), nor Caractère (incense). Bogart Signature? Not even close. They are no more alike than by the era Fragantica claims they are, but absolutely not. I have all of them present, some in old and current versions. Believe me, OdlR PL is more ‘dressy’ than PR, but very similar in cut and concept in terms of results, referring to pre-reformulation PR. I suppose they can be substituted if you’re looking for something more elegant. PR is unique and wonderful, but a virtue depending on how you look at it; despite its mastery, it has something of being popular. Oscar de la Renta is a perfume self-aware of its extreme refinement. Saying both are masterpieces doesn’t seem like an exaggeration.
A real old-school beast. This 80s fragrance for very masculine men (neither macho nor grumpy old men) who wanted to leave a mark and did. To me, it smells like a mix of One Man Show, Paco Rabanne Pour Homme, and Puig’s Quorum (without the pine smell), very far from Chanel’s Antaeus. It’s lavender, blanket aldehydes, anise, juniper, cinnamon, cyclamen, geranium, carnation (a floral note that needs reclaiming), patchouli, vetiver, and a soft leather and musky wood base. Longevity is long, about 8 hours on skin with a sillage of 1.5 meters. It’s not for heat; it’s enchanting, very masculine, and seductive. It’s for gentlemen over 40 who have character. Affordable price, between 25 and 40 euros in Spain. Hard to find in regular stores, but it’s not discontinued and you can find it on perfumer websites.
This gem is a masterpiece of the old school that reminds us of the glory of perfumes from before, when men smelled of neatness and elegance, not those generic, soulless, unartisanal scents of today. It’s pure luxury alongside Carlo Corinto, two fragrances that, for their style and finesse, command the most respect in my collection.
If you’re reviewing a reformulated perfume, you must clarify which version you’re talking about because it changes everything. The current one, made in the US, is a mild and wearable cologne but with very little sillage, as if someone poured tap water on the original and washed away the fine details. It lacks that lyricism and poetry found in the vintage versions, so don’t get fooled. In Spain, it costs about 20 euros, but Quorum can be found for half the price. That’s all.
It’s a classic, soap-like fragrance. I don’t know the Chanel Antaeus, but I do have Jac Bogart’s One Man Show; they have the same vibe, though this one is more refined, even if it lacks the elevated notes of OMS. Its sillage and projection are moderate. If you like 80s and early 90s classics, it’s totally recommended.
I bought it blind without knowing what to expect. Upon application, the first impression was strong and unpleasant, something that clings a lot. But as hours passed, the top notes changed and it became more tolerable, with a clean sensation. My feeling is that it smells like a man over 50, like the fragrances my uncles used in the 80s. Although generally it’s a good fragrance, it’s an acquired taste. It’s not for everyone, but it definitely deserves a second chance.
I arrived home with $50 from my dad, and since the universe owed me, I headed straight to the perfumery. Among the classic deals, my eye landed on Oscar de la Renta Pour Lui. The saleswoman, helped by a young girl, showed me the Benneton Cold first, but I had my sights set elsewhere. After testing the cap of Z14, I was disappointed by that ripe orange and cinnamon scent, so I went straight to OdlR. The moment I smelled it, the vapors reminded me of Chanel’s Antaeus. I bought it on the spot. I wore it at a spicy taco place in Zacatecas and was surprised: the opening is synthetic, yes, but it doesn’t smell like cleaner or cheap quality. With a bit of wear, the nuances improve. It’s a French lavender, floral, and soft, with textures reminiscent of the veins of a tobacco leaf. It evokes Paco Rabanne Pour Homme a lot, with high-quality aldehydes, carnation, cinnamon, and a base of oakmoss, musk, and a smoky leather touch. The longevity is decent; 10 sprays last well on my skin, better than the old Drakkar or Bentley. It’s fresh, powdery, and timeless, ideal for a business casual look or older gentlemen, avoiding overly casual outfits. It works in autumn, spring, rainy summer, and warm winter. The current formula is a light chypre, not a heavy leather. The projection fades quickly due to the oakmoss and leather, but the sillage is good. After wearing it for a few days, I noticed that on my shirt, it projects for a couple of days with rich bursts of oakmoss and musk as my body heats up, something many new perfumes can’t achieve. It’s dense, aldehydic, and sweet only from the musk. Recommended.
I met it in 1992-94 when it was barely an infant, a vial that left its masculine scent marked on me. I bought it years ago and have used it a lot. The opening has lavender, violet, and basil, bergamot citrus, the sweetness of geranium and clove, and a base of leather, vetiver, and cedar, very much old-school barbershop. After the alcohol settles, you feel more vetiver, cedar, moss, and leather, embraced by lavender and a powdery patchouli. On blotter, you notice more sandalwood and labdanum. It goes from casual to elegant, not for daily wear or the office, but for outdoor activities due to its sillage and longevity. I consider it for men over 38, though a risk-taker around 30 with a leather jacket or suit could pull it off. Unfortunately, the aldehydes seem oxidized and give an acidic touch at the start. It’s cheap, around 450 Mexican pesos (27 dollars); I’d prefer a 30ml or 60ml version to avoid oxidation, and I’d still try to buy it again.
My tastes have evolved, and this is one of my top 60 fragrances. I bought it two weeks ago and have been using it every day since. At 27, it fits me perfectly. I usually wear jeans and a shirt, the ideal outfit for this gentleman of perfume. I know some reviews mention a certain age, but I think it suits a confident man. I’ve received compliments, and it makes me feel very masculine. Try it. It works for all weather except extreme heat, can be semi-formal or formal. It’s the aldehydes that give it that fresh touch.
I have it in my hand and smell it all the time; it’s elegant and causes me a lot of nostalgia, probably because I smelled it when I was young and it got etched into my memory. I recommend it 100% for night and elegant wear.
A great vintage perfume, old school. It must be one of the few times I agree with Fragrantica: it’s a blend of Chanel’s Antaeus and Jacques Bogart’s One Man Show. It’s more measured than the latter, which is bright green. The combination of aldehydes and clove brings it close to that era’s vibe. The only downside is that the current performance is a bit weak. It’s a must-have if you’re a vintage lover.
This is a PERFUMAZO. It’s solid and masculine, but not dense or dark. A timeless hit in great form. It’s old school, not following commercial trends. It gives me a sensation of clean, soapy wet tobacco with oakmoss. It’s a gem to discover, not for those who already love cheap vintage. Try it; it smells like a charming, formal man, and its performance beats several current EDTs or reformulations like Issey Miyake or Polo Green. Ideal for late spring and winter, for day or night depending on the cold.
A gem of perfumery; every time I discover more interesting nuances. It’s a perfume for any season; those soapy aldehyde and floral tones with hints of leather and oakmoss send a message of masculinity and seduction.
Sorry, I think I’m concluding my vintage exploration with this one. It smells old. I know it’s subjective, but my olfactory memory doesn’t lie. I’ve only smelled these aromas in places for the elderly, like Karl Lagerfeld or GBH for the home. I can’t fool my nose. I’d prefer to leave them behind and gift them to my grandfather, as they aren’t popular. For vintage, I’ll stick with Kouros.
I just started collecting vintage perfumes, and this was a blind buy success. I’m exploring it, and it feels very pleasant and masculine. At first, with the citrus and leather, it reminds me of Antaeus, but then it shifts to a well-crafted floral accord that softens it and adds depth. It feels ideal for intermediate seasons, neither too cold nor too hot. It’s versatile, suitable for day and night, works in the office or at social events, and projects a mature image on dates.
Reminds me of Lancôme’s O, but I absolutely love it on my boyfriend.
You can’t cover the sky with your hand; it smells old. The aldehydes threw me off at first, but over time they balanced out. Now everything fits better; it’s still that spiced floral barbershop vibe with a lavender base. I like it and use it a lot, though I think the 4/5 rating on Fragrantica is too high. The current version works year-round, even in summer.