Skip to content

Dieciocho by MARIA CHER.

Women 2017

Description

Dieciocho by MARIA CHER. is a floral fruity gourmand fragrance for women. Launched in 2017, this composition features an olfactory pyramid that opens with top notes of gardenia, orange, and tangerine; develops into a heart of honey, orange blossom, and peach; and settles on a base of caramel, beeswax, and patchouli. The fragrance was created by the perfumer.

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 39%
  • Spring 18%
  • Summer 8.4%
  • Autumn 35%
  • Day 52%
  • Night 48%

Key notes

Community

205 votes

  • Positive 78%
  • Negative 9.3%
  • Neutral 13%
positive reviews 205 community votes
LongevityModerate SillageModerate Best momentWinter CharacterFeminine

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I own it

534 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Winter

274 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Day

155 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About Dieciocho

Main accord honeyed Year 2017 Gender Women

Dieciocho by MARIA CHER. is a floral fruity gourmand fragrance for women. Launched in 2017, this composition features an olfactory pyramid that opens with top notes of gardenia, orange, and tangerine; develops into a heart of honey, orange blossom, and peach; and settles on a base of caramel, beeswax, and patchouli. The fragrance was created by the perfumer.

White flowers Sweet and gourmand Fruits, vegetables and nuts Musk, amber and animalic Woods and mosses

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Moderate

158 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Moderate

158 votes

Character

Leading answer Traditionally feminine

158 votes

Value perception

Leading answer Good value

160 votes

Community reviews

40 reviews

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review

Add your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk.

Your rating optional
Your take, in one line optional
Your take, in one line

  1. I got flooded with compliments about the longevity and the praise it supposedly received, so I bought it blindly. Result: it smells like cheap plastic, reminds me of an Antonio Banderas fragrance but worse, and on my skin it barely lasts two hours. I tried the 18 Glossy too and couldn’t stand it either; they smell like low-quality perfume. @Fer96’s review of this line is the complete one.

    Reply
  2. Rich, sweet, and youthful. A good dupe for Scandal EDP, very honeyed and gives me a toothache.

    Reply
  3. denissebellini

    Cher 18 is good, it’s floral and fresh, but it’s a fragrance that doesn’t stand out; it’s very overused.

    Reply
  4. I like it but it doesn’t fully convince me; it smells like sweet vanilla without originality and it wore me out. It doesn’t last more than four hours; I prefer its body splash version, which is more wearable. They say it smells like cat urine, but I have one and they don’t resemble each other at all, nor are they dupes; my cat’s Elixir lasts longer. If it doesn’t suit your skin, use it only on clothes. I wouldn’t buy it again.

    Reply
  5. My first national love and the one I’ll always buy again. It’s sweet (a lot), persistent, feminine, and has a great price-to-quality ratio. The Glitter version is the same, but be careful: the glitters clog the atomizer and stop the perfume from coming out; mine evaporated from somewhere. Fan of the 18 and I recommend everyone get one.

    Reply
  6. Blondielicious

    🌺🍊~ Cher 18 Glossy ~🥥🍬 I bought it blindly because of its tangerine scent (I hate that aroma in life but I love it in perfumery) and its creamy meringue notes, far from the honey of the classic version. Does anyone else feel it smells hyper-similar to Pepe Jeans London for Her (the coral cup)? I do. It’s rich, but I imagined it would be more different from the Classic 18; without being the same, it retains too much of the DNA. I bought it thinking it was a different scent, and it turns out it’s very muddied. I’ll use it anyway because for its price it’s pleasant, even on spring days. I recommend it for a teenage audience.

    Reply
  7. I’m reviewing again to compare Cher 18 with its dupes (which aren’t on Fragrantica): 🍯 Cher 18 EDP: Pretty, sweet, and honeyed. It resembles JPG’s Scandal but with more flowers and fruits at the start, and it’s less heavy. Ideal for autumn-winter and very versatile. I think it’s the most ‘burned,’ I hear it a lot on the street. 🍯✨ Cher 18 Glitter Edition: Same as the EDP but with glitters; the honey is more noticeable. They are almost identical in scent, but since it’s thicker, it lasts longer. It’s the hardest to find; I only saw it at Parfumerie. 🍮👠 Cher 18 Elixir: It’s Le Parfum, not EDP. Very concentrated, sweet, and caramelized; the flowers go unnoticed. Better not to over-spray so you don’t get sickly sweet. It projects a lot, lasts until the next day, and weeks on clothes. Sweet and elegant, perfect for winter and night. 🍊 Cher 18 Glossy: The most distinct and least original. On my skin, it’s the fruity notes with a vanilla base (my sister smells more vanilla). Ideal for spring or cool days. It doesn’t seem like Scandal, but it does resemble the JPG style. I think it’s a dupe for La Belle, which I also didn’t like. Of all the versions, this was the one I liked the least. 🍹🥂🍊 Cher 18 Spritz: I felt something similar before. At first, it reminds me of the original Cher 18, but later the tangerine takes the spotlight. It smells like tangerine with an effervescent and nocturnal touch. It’s rich but not overwhelming; it reminded me of summer perfumes like Kaiak or IN2U, though maybe it’s more for night. Of all the flankers, this has the least longevity. I don’t know which is my favorite, maybe the Glitter. I hope Cher improves the bottles; the atomizers break quickly.

    Reply
  8. It’s a strident, extroverted, sickly sweet, and ultra-feminine fragrance. Mainly honey with flowers and fruits in the background. I didn’t know it and found it pleasant, but knowing it was ‘burned’ and reading that someone called it a lady’s perfume, now I feel that way. Maybe it’s not the scent (which is gourmand and contemporary), but its suffocating aspect. The performance is incredible, but it could bother people around you. It also has a powdery note that you can feel and could be considered old-fashioned, but in my opinion it’s well-mixed and doesn’t clash with the honey.

    Reply
  9. In my opinion, it’s a pretty, sweet, very honeyed, and floral fragrance. It doesn’t overwhelm or give me headaches like others. It has differences from Scandal: this smells much sweeter and more basic, while the original has different twists. They are both pretty perfumes for lovers of sweet scents. If you like Scandal but not its price, try this. If you like sweet perfumes, I also recommend it. It’s for everyday wear with longevity appropriate to the price. It’s a 7/10.

    Reply
  10. Ana220895

    I don’t like this Scandal imitation. I wouldn’t buy it. It doesn’t generate anything for me; I’m just tired of smelling it; with this version, the Scandal scent became mass-produced with a tacky

    Reply
  11. Honey, honey, and more honey. Literally smells like a jar of honey, sweet and potent. At first, I wasn’t convinced because it’s strong, but over time I fell in love with it, especially the dry-down. I get why some people can’t handle it; if you over-spray, it’s unbearable. I love it, but if you’re looking for something subtle, this isn’t it.

    Reply
  12. If the word ‘trashy’ had a smell, it would be this little bottle.

    Reply
  13. Blondielicious

    Scandal never won me over, but years later I felt the need to try it again. I wasn’t planning to spend much since it’s not one of my favorites, but I wanted that sweet note in my collection. When I tested this version, I liked it quite a bit. It’s identical and delicious. I loved it for everyday wear, though I feel it’s a bit too strong for daytime and feels a bit short for evening. I find it youthful, nothing sophisticated or sensual. I’d give it a 7. It’s tasty, but on me it doesn’t last more than 3 or 4 hours. Maybe I should let it mature.

    Reply
  14. flor.lucia

    One of my most-used perfumes, spectacular. I’d dare say everyone likes it (unless you hate sweets). It has a sparkling, honeyed touch, but it’s nowhere near cloying. I’d say it’s fresh; I wear it during the day. Although it’s a chameleon for any season, I enjoy it most in spring and summer. I LOVE it.

    Reply
  15. Chocolate con licor

    What a UGLY thing, worse than Scandal, which I already hated for its strong patchouli and intense honey. This smells super sweet, syrupy, and cloying, quite synthetic; I only notice caramel and honey. The scent is heavy, although the trail and longevity aren’t bad and it’s cheap. It’s not elegant, not youthful, not fresh, not warm. It smells like a 14-year-old covering up armpit odor after gym class. I think it’s very ugly and nonsensical. 2/10, the only good things are the price and longevity.

    Reply
  16. delfina1993

    I like it because on my skin it ends up soapy. I thought I’d hate it, but I find it very wearable, sweet in an oriental and mature way.

    Reply
  17. Valentinesday

    I find it very heavy and I don’t like the opening. If it’s rich after a while, but at first it smells very cloying or like orange.

    Reply
  18. Rich, honey scent, but nothing groundbreaking. It’s a successful perfume that’s quite overused in Argentina; everyone wears it. I’m waiting for the Eighteen Elixir to launch, because that one, I stand up for, it’s excellent. I usually get migraines with very sweet perfumes, but it has such a floral opening that it makes up for it. Super addictive and lasts all day.

    Reply
  19. Very delicious, feminine, and sweet. I repurchased it twice, and I think it’s a great buy without even seeing the bottle.

    Reply
  20. FlorFanatica

    I bought it a long time ago just because people liked it and said it was similar to Scandal (I don’t know why I didn’t try it) and I had to give it away because it was extremely sweet. The honey felt too much on my skin and I couldn’t tolerate it; it was overwhelming.

    Reply
  21. On hot days it can be cloying and heavy, making it ideal for fall and winter. It’s the dupe for Scandal: the original projects more strongly, but once they dry down, they are almost identical. It’s sweet, gourmand, and super honeyed. I own all the versions, and this is my favorite from the brand because it smells natural, not synthetic. It lasts about 4-5 hours. Warning: use it quickly or the spray will break and become sticky. It’s super versatile for day and night, though my favorite is the Elixir.

    Reply
  22. Andrea1998q

    So far, the most flattering. In Argentina, it’s a bit intense, but it leaves a unique scent. If I describe it in a few words: feminine, sophisticated, and bold. It’s not youthful; I’ve seen it on women over 50, and it looks incredible on them. It suits all ages. The longevity is excellent; I recommend it for winter. It looks good day or night, but not in extreme heat because it’s strong and sweet. It’s a sweet scent worth it; there’s a note that balances the caramel and honey, perhaps citrus or patchouli. One of my favorites 💞

    Reply
  23. To me, it’s excessively cloying. It smells like a kids’ birthday party with candies, cotton candy, and an overloaded cake with dulce de leche and sprinkles. Tremendously sweet. Its success must be that young girls like it; it has designer-level projection and lasts a long time for a low price and is available everywhere. It’s a hit among young people here. Honestly, none of the Cher scents caught my attention; at that price, I prefer an Arabic perfume with more complex notes than just being cloying. If you’re looking for something original and you’re over 27, this isn’t it.

    Reply
  24. acquarella

    I bought it because of the endless positive reviews… I don’t know if I got a faulty bottle or if my nose is failing, but I don’t feel anything they say. Is the smell of turpentine the ‘beeswax’? Definitely not honey. No citrus notes. Maybe turpentine with a 0.01% touch of synthetic peach. I’ll go try it in a store to see if I change my review… for now, I advise you not to make my mistake of buying it blind.

    Reply
  25. Natalia98

    I have the Glitters edition, I bought it for that and the reviews, but honestly I only smell honey. It’s not a fragrance I’d choose; it’s too sweet, purely honeyed, at least on my skin. Someday I’ll have the courage to use it so it doesn’t go to waste on my shelf.

    Reply
  26. Jaazirainbow

    A BEAUTIFUL perfume that makes you want to eat it because of how intense the honey is (unlike Scandal, where it’s more subtle). The dupe is very well done; the only negative is the longevity: on my skin, it barely lasts 2 hours. 😪

    Reply
  27. On my skin, it unfortunately fixes only the honey. A realistic, almost naive honey. I don’t dislike it, but I don’t like smelling just honey. I was lucky enough to buy the bodysplash and body lotion set, and that’s when things changed: I smelled something like Black Opium with just a hint of honey, I loved it! I’ll use the bodysplash version then, which, with the cream, has good staying power.

    Reply
  28. I have the Glitter edition; I bought it for that and the reviews, but I only smell honey. It’s not a perfume I’d choose; it’s too sweet, just honeyed, at least on my skin. Someday I’ll have the guts to wear it before it goes bad on the shelf.

    Reply
  29. I didn’t like it at all right after buying it; I felt it was the typical shopping mall perfume smell. I started using it later because my others ran out and I grew to like it; the honey is very noticeable and it’s good for those who love caramelized perfumes. Now I use it almost every day lol

    Reply