Men
Anarchist A
Acordes principales
Descripción
Anarchist A by Toskovat' is an aromatic fragrance for men and women. Launched in 2022, the nose behind this creation is David-Lev Jipa-Slivinschi. The top notes are credit cards, whisky, and snow; the heart notes evoke money, candle wax, and ink; while the base notes reveal a plastic bag, priest's vestments, holy water, precious woods, and sacred green frankincense resin.
Resumen rápido
Cuándo llevarla (votos)
Notas clave
Comunidad
590 votos
- Positivo 55%
- Negativo 32%
- Neutral 12%
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Anarchist A y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en AmazoneBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBayCaracterísticas
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
13 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:








This one definitely has to smell different, hehe
Sounds interesting, haha
I think it’s quite disrespectful to consumers for perfumes to declare invented notes. It’s the reviewer’s job to affirm whether this perfume smells like money, holy water, or a priest’s robe. The same goes for scents like ‘lava’ (by the way, I highly doubt perfumes that list ‘lava’ among their notes smell like rotten eggs, which is what real lava would smell like in nature). And honestly, I’d be more excited if they cited the specific chemical supposedly behind the fantasy notes directly. It’s much clearer, instructive, and I’m glad to see new molecules continue to be discovered and implemented. We should even seriously consider whether declaring notes like ‘lotus’ or ‘poppy’ is also a way of pulling our legs. It would be much clearer if they told me that linalool or an extract of [insert scented flower] combined with calone was used, for example.
Friends, this smells strongly of musk at first, but ends with tobacco and wet earth, a bit green according to reviews I’ve researched. But why break the fantasy of thinking we smell like an exorcism?
@NaeLisa97 I’d say it’s because you’re creating the fantasy yourself, and indeed, if you look at my reviews, you won’t find anything else but me building fantasies with all kinds of things. However, I expect Fragrantica as a directory to inform me with maximum precision and not try to push pre-made fantasies on me. The fantasy belongs to whoever knows how to evoke it in the blend, not to someone who just limits themselves to naming it in the profile. Not to mention that this practice of declaring notes beyond chemistry carries the danger of creating a speculative bubble and threatens a landscape where every house, to compete, will race to see who can release the most spectacular one. All this means users won’t get to know what fragrances actually smell like, further darkening the education in applied chemistry one can acquire through this hobby.
@lapuertaenelojo Perfumery is an art. I think you’re expecting too much from both perfumers and Fragrantica; neither owes us anything. On the other hand, we must distinguish between the concept of a ‘note’ and perfume ingredients. Notes are perceptions, and the artist has every right to believe they’ve found the aromatic notes they declare. What’s different is what each person perceives from the same scent.
The notes are completely made up; they’re just using a very dismissive strategy toward buyers. It doesn’t smell like anything related to the notes beyond the wood.
The notes are a total fabrication; they’re just using a condescending strategy for buyers, and it doesn’t smell like anything related to the notes beyond the wood
@jeloumaifelas Every artist owes respect to their audience for the time and attention they receive. Attempting to determine audience sensations by declaring a series of heavily distorted accords in a database is, first, inflating a bubble (because more and more fragrances will have to declare non-substances to compete in this economy of delirium). And second, it’s kitsch. It’s bad art, done by someone who doesn’t trust their talent to convey an emotion and feels the need to point it out explicitly. In literature, they say ‘show, don’t tell.’ I believe the same standard should apply here.
🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
To me, it literally smells like tires (not necessarily a bad thing).
An utterly absurd aroma, starting with the declared notes. The brand Toskovat often produces fragrances so ‘complex’ that they veer into vulgarity—hard to wear not because they’re challenging, but because they end up with a synthetic base from a poorly blended mix, regardless of the high price tag. The note list is clearly a cover-up for ingredients that, instead of creating magic, breed distrust. What does it smell like? A fresh, animalic, and sweet space, like mixing commercial candies with commercial blue lines. Is it worth it? Absolutely not; leave it on the shelf.
I liked it. It’s a rare scent; I haven’t tried it yet, but it reminds me of Rubini’s Nuvolari, which I own and wear occasionally (it’s not easy to find): they share that asphalt and tire accord, spacious with a touch of sweetness. Perfect for cool nights in open spaces. You have to know how to wear them, or the perfume will wear you out.