Skip to content

Estée by Estée Lauder

Women 2015

Description

Estée by Estée Lauder is a women's fragrance from the floral family. Launched in 2015, this olfactive composition features jasmine, rose, and valley lily (muguet) in the top notes; ylang-ylang, coriander, and lily root in the heart; and moss and sandalwood in the base.

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 22%
  • Spring 31%
  • Summer 15%
  • Autumn 31%
  • Day 65%
  • Night 35%

Key notes

Community

282 votes

  • Positive 76%
  • Negative 13%
  • Neutral 11%
positive reviews 282 community votes
LongevityModerate SillageModerate Best momentDay CharacterFeminine

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I own it

832 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Spring

274 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Day

145 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About Estée

Main accord white-floral Year 2015 Gender Women

Estée by Estée Lauder is a women’s fragrance from the floral family. Launched in 2015, this olfactive composition features jasmine, rose, and valley lily (muguet) in the top notes; ylang-ylang, coriander, and lily root in the heart; and moss and sandalwood in the base.

White flowers Flowers Green, herbal and fougère Woods and mosses

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Moderate

149 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Moderate

159 votes

Character

Leading answer Traditionally feminine

123 votes

Value perception

Leading answer Fair price

109 votes

Community reviews

2 reviews

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review

Add your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk.

Your rating optional
Your take, in one line optional
Your take, in one line

  1. I tried this perfume to continue exploring aldehydes, which bother me so much in Chanel 5 and Jovan Musk, following the wise guidance of @La DameDeNoir. Well, neither in Estée nor in Knowing do they bother me at all, and I liked both perfumes very, very much. Now, is Estée a masterpiece? It must have been. The problem is that I only got to the reformulation. And that, even without having tried the original with its pineapple bottle (beautiful), is noticeable. As I already said, I am totally ignorant about perfumery. However, it seems to me that my current little bottle is… watered down. One thing is for a perfume to be subtle, and another is to have to search for its scent to find it (maybe I’m exaggerating). Despite everything, what you can perceive is, yes, marvelous. I (from my immense ignorance) would say it equals classicism in perfumery. Nothing in excess, everything in its place. Even someone who leans toward baroque and decadence (I’m dying to try Boudoir by Vivienne Westwood after the atrocities I’ve read) surrenders to the harmony of Estée (which I can’t find in Chanel 5). I don’t single out a single note because everything seems perfectly blended to me. And that, as I say, from a version that is (I have the impression) watered down. If I’m wrong, please tell me, we’re here to learn… Later I’ll write about Knowing, Private Collection and Spellbound (the latter two thrilled me, despite being in the same new format, which I suspect is much weaker than the originals).

    Reply
  2. I tried this to keep investigating aldehydes, which give me trouble in Chanel No. 5 and Jovan Musk, following @LaDameDeNoir’s advice. Turns out they don’t bother me at all in Estée and Knowing, and I absolutely love both. Now, is Estée a masterpiece? It should be. The problem is I only have the reformulation, and even though I haven’t tried the original with its beautiful pineapple bottle, the difference is noticeable. As I said, I’m a total novice in perfumery, but this current bottle seems… watery. One thing is being subtle, another is having to hunt for the scent (maybe I’m exaggerating). Despite that, what you perceive is wonderful. From my ignorance, I’d say it’s classicism in perfumery: nothing excessive, everything in its place. Even someone seeking baroque decadence (I’m dying to try Boudoir by Vivienne Westwood after reading the atrocities I’ve encountered) is won over by Estée’s harmony, which I simply don’t find in Chanel No. 5. I won’t highlight any specific note because everything is perfectly integrated. And that, as I said, from a version I feel is watery. If I’m wrong, let me know, because we’re here to learn… I’ll write about Knowing, Private Collection, and Spellbound next (these two thrilled me, despite being in the new format, which I suspect is much weaker than the originals).

    Reply