Men
Fantasme
Acordes principales
Descripción
Fantasme by Ted Lapidus is a fruity floral fragrance for women. Launched in 1992, the nose behind this composition is Pierre Bourdon. The top notes include peach, pineapple, violet, green notes, and bergamot; the heart features raspberry, damask rose, iris root, jasmine, and lily of the valley; while the base notes reveal vanilla, musk, sandalwood, and cedar.
Resumen rápido
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Fantasme y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
24 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
I regret buying this perfume. I purchased it and it disappointed me; it seemed excessively sweet and, simply, I didn’t like it.
I regret buying it; it disappointed me a lot; it seemed excessively sweet and simply didn’t work for me.
Although it’s excessively sweet, it has very good fixation and trail, ideal for winter or nighttime. It’s cloying, yes, but very rich.
To me, it smells like honey and pineapple, and since I love sweet scents, I always buy it. It’s affordable, has excellent fixation, and good longevity; it delivers everything Sissy Emperatriz describes.
To me, it smells like honey and pineapple. Since I love sweet scents, I always buy it. It’s affordable, has excellent fixation, and good longevity; it delivers everything Sissy Emperatriz describes.
I think this perfume is for a woman who is already a mom. I get the impression it’s a fragrance for a very warm and sweet woman. I bought it a few months ago and wear it to sleep; it relaxes me, it’s ideal for the night. I think it would be a flawless gift for an aunt or a mom. I’d say it’s elegant.
I think this is for a woman who is already a mom. It gives me the impression of being a fragrance for someone very warm and sweet. I bought it a few months ago and wear it to sleep; it relaxes me, it’s ideal for the night. It would be a flawless gift for an aunt or a mom. I’d say it’s elegant.
A world of flavors… sparkling, youthful, and charmingly synthetic, deeply flirtatious without being heavy or old-fashioned. I have a lovely story with it that dates back to teenage loves; I share it on my blog. Sillage: acidic, synthetic red raspberry, nuanced with peaches, vanilla, and musk that occasionally leaves earthy, wet notes. I think it’s been reformulated; I remember it as more intrusive and sparkling. Excellent longevity and projection.
I love it, past, present, and future: a super sensual scent.
Take a pineapple, mix it with a splash of Cointreau, and that’s Fantasme. That nostalgic sweetness of early 90s night perfumes. Your leggings, your shoulder pads, your teased hair… what nostalgia! Please bring back the 90s!
Grab a pineapple, mix it with a splash of Cointreau, and that’s Fantasme. That nostalgic sweetness of early 90s night perfumes. Your leg warmers, your shoulder pads, your teased hair… what nostalgia? Please, bring back the 90s!
Horrible. I bought it solely for its ingredients: peach, Damask rose, lily-of-the-valley root, freesia, sandalwood, musk, vanilla, and cedar—scents I love, and the ones that make up most of the perfumes I adore… Oh, a letdown. It’s not powdery or fruity at all… It disappointed me completely; it smells like a cheap perfume. Yes, I know it’s cheap, but in my case, not even free; there are perfumes that cost less than half this price that are absolutely delicious, so this one isn’t even worth 10% of its cost. It’s extremely heavy, it just smells of violet and jasmine to me, which are scents I hate when they’re too dominant. That said, its nauseating smell is quite durable.
I didn’t like it. I bought it blindly based on its notes, thinking I didn’t know it. Mistake—I do know it; it’s a scent a friend of my mother used when I was a child, and I never liked it. I recognized it immediately. It’s like a failed version of Lancôme’s Tresor. The peach note is so synthetic it reminds me of the plastic of old dolls, or maybe I’m still optimistic, a pouch of peach juice. I really like bergamot as an opening note: impactful and lively, but in this perfume, it gets tangled with the violet and feels heavy and jarring. Points in its favor are its trail and longevity. On my skin, about 8 hours; on clothes, much longer, and for the price it has… if it’s your taste, you’ve found a treasure. Another point is that despite being sweet, I don’t feel it’s cloying; I suppose its acidic touch prevents that. Anyway, I’ll try it in full winter to see if my impression improves; for now, it’s a resounding ‘no’.
It didn’t convince me. I bought it blindly, trusting the notes, without realizing I already knew it: it was the scent of my mother’s friend from my childhood and I never liked it; I recognized it immediately. It’s like a failed version of Lancôme’s Tresor. The peach is so synthetic it reminds me of plastic from old dolls or, if I’m optimistic, peach juice in a pouch. I love the bergamot opening: impactful and lively, but here it gets tangled with the violet and results in a heavy, jarring experience. The good thing is its trail and longevity: about 8 hours on skin and much longer on clothes. For the price, if it’s your taste, it’s a treasure. Despite being sweet, it doesn’t feel cloying to me, I suppose the acidic touch saves it. For now, it’s a resounding no, but I’ll try it in winter to see if it improves.
I had it a long time ago and don’t remember its scent well, but I know I loved it; now I haven’t seen it around here anymore, so I’ll try to get it again. I do remember it was very long-lasting and sweetly warm.
Fantasme is a perfume I owned a long time ago and almost forgot until I got a new bottle; I bought it because it was very cheap, and for 100 ml, I have absolutely no regrets. It’s enveloping, voracious, sweet, and cloying like few others; that’s this nearly vanished bottle of Ted Lapidus. If you want a soft, youthful perfume, Fantasme is the opposite: a few drops are enough to make your whole body smell sweet. It’s extremely strong and warm, with tremendous longevity, but if you wear it well, the trail isn’t heavy. That persistent peach and pineapple scent makes it ideal for cold, rainy winter days when you’re lacking energy. Fantasme wakes you up and leaves you at 1000% per hour without asking permission; you just need to know how to wear it to enjoy it to the fullest. It’s a characterful perfume, not suitable for women who prefer ethereal and subtle scents.
Fantasme is a perfume I’ve had for a long time and almost forgot about until I got another bottle, mainly because it cost me very little, and for 100ml, I absolutely have no regrets. It’s enveloping, voracious, sweet, and cloying like few others; that’s this nearly extinct Ted Lapidus little bottle. And if you want a soft, cheerful perfume, Fantasme is clearly the opposite, because a few drops are enough for your whole body to smell sweet. It’s extremely strong and warm, with tremendous longevity, but if you use it properly, the trail it leaves is not at all heavy. That persistent peach and pineapple scent makes it ideal for cold, rainy winter days when you’re lacking energy. Fantasme wakes you up and leaves you at 1000% per hour without asking permission; you just need to know how to wear it to enjoy it to the max. A perfume with character, not suitable for women who prefer ethereal and subtle scents.
It’s a rich and delightful aroma. I tested it in SUMMER (around 20/25°C) on my skin. It opens with a delicate scent of violet soap or soft flowers, then gives way to a soft peach body cream; I assume this is due to the clean musk that’s always present from its initial phase. In its development, it smells like a raspberry or red fruit shampoo, sweet and soft, nothing annoying, like those kids’ shampoos. When it dries down, I smell a creamy vanilla ice cream half-melted, fragrant and delicate. In summary, it smells totally clean, fresh, like just out of the shower. I don’t notice the green notes, the lily-of-the-valley root, or the other notes. The trail is soft for the first hour, then it stays skin-close. Longevity is about 7 hours, and it projects well for the first hour. Price is more than accessible. NOTE: In the middle of WINTER, its projection is incredible, and its aroma of sweet, mature peaches is truly overwhelming; its resemblance to Lancôme’s Tresor is undeniable, and it costs only a fraction of what that one does.
I grabbed a tester at a ridiculous price and, being a peach lover, bought it instantly. I loved it from the first spray. Although it screams ’90s’ with its notes, it works perfectly today. On my skin, it opens with violets, transitions into a creamy, vanilla-peach scent over soft sandalwood and a permanent musk. I can’t detect the rest, but in another season, like right now in the middle of summer, it would surely shine brighter. I disagree with those who say it smells cheap; it’s fun and informal, but that doesn’t make it low quality. It’s a beautiful, striking aroma with a touch of iris that gives it character. In short, I loved it a lot and will keep it in my collection forever.
I found a tester at a ridiculously low price and bought it solely based on its notes, especially since I’m a peach lover when it comes to perfumery. I loved it from the first spritz. While it has very marked 90s vibes, starting with the sheer number of notes, it’s perfectly wearable today. On my skin, it opens with a dominance of violets before transitioning into a creamy, vanilla-peach scent supported by a soft sandalwood and a permanent musk. I haven’t managed to perceive the rest of the notes yet, but I imagine they’ll shine better in another season (I’m testing it in the middle of summer right now). I disagree with those who categorize it as a cheap-smelling fragrance; I think it’s directly fun and informal, but that doesn’t make it a ‘cheap’ perfume. It’s a pleasant, particularly beautiful and striking aroma that even possesses a touch of iris that peeks out occasionally, giving it a distinct vibe. In short, I’ve really liked it and intend to keep it permanently in my small collection.
I was surprised! It smells exactly like 90s perfumes that carried so many notes and were super intense. It feels like Ted Lapidus Homme but with violets. Maybe because they share so many notes like rose, cedar, lily, sandalwood, etc.? But here’s the kicker: within a couple of minutes, it stops smelling almost completely. You’re left with a very skin-close, heavily vanilla-scented odor. What a shame…
It’s no longer available in Mexico; I just received one I ordered from Fragrancenet in the US. It’s a serious store; I’ve bought a lot there, but this time it was a huge disappointment. It’s not even a pale shadow of what it used to be: it doesn’t last, doesn’t project, and doesn’t resemble the amazing perfume it once was. It would be better if they stopped selling it than to dare to deliver this garbage, which is authentic trash.
It’s no longer available in Mexico; I just received one I bought from Fragrancenet in the US. It’s a reputable site—I’ve bought a lot from them—but this time the perfume was a huge letdown. It’s not even a pale shadow of what it used to be; it doesn’t last, doesn’t project, and bears no resemblance to the amazing fragrance it once was. It would be better if they just stopped selling it rather than daring to deliver this garbage, which is truly authentic trash.
Bought it blindly based on the notes and reviews. At first, it explodes with an intense, synthetic yet unmistakably peach scent. Over time, I detect hints of pineapple and some raspberry, though the peach still dominates, followed by a touch of lily of the valley that you only catch if you hold it very close. When it dries down, it leaves a warm, pleasant trail of vanilla, sandalwood, and musk. None of the other Fragrantica notes are noticeable. What struck me was the label on the bottom of the bottle listing the profile as ‘FRUITY, FLORAL, VANILLA’ with blackberry, cassis, raspberry, rose, jasmine, iris, magnolia, freesia, sandalwood, vanilla, and musk… Nowhere does it mention peach, which is what smells the strongest; I can barely guess at a touch of cassis and a sweet hint of freesia… I don’t know, is this a new formulation? In my personal opinion, it’s not an unpleasant scent; it does remind me of Lancôme’s Tresor due to shared notes. But Fantasme is to Tresor what Benetton’s Hot is to Allure. A synthetic, budget-friendly version that a trained nose can easily spot, so don’t get fooled. It’s not bad for the price, but it’s not comparable in subtlety or longevity to the niche perfume it resembles (after 3 hours, I’m left with just a faint whisper of peach-sandalwood-vanilla… synthetic). I won’t be buying it again.